A First-Of-Its-Kind Magazine On Environment Which Is For Nature, Of Nature, By Us (RNI No.: UPBIL/2016/66220)

Support Us
Magazine Subcription

Balance between development & conservation needed

TreeTake is a monthly bilingual colour magazine on environment that is fully committed to serving Mother Nature with well researched, interactive and engaging articles and lots of interesting info.

Balance between development & conservation needed

Sustainable development that keeps biodiversity at its core is the need of the hour. It is important then, to go for regulations and not prohibitions in such cases...

Balance between development & conservation needed


We Asked: Do you think throwing eco sensitive zones open to tourism will be a good idea?

Over the years, due to rapid urbanisation, the ecologically sensitive areas have undergone a great amount of change and some of them are now situated in the middle of human population which is not at all a good signal, in fact an alarming one. Ecologically Sensitive Areas basically refers to those areas which have been identified by MOEFCC as areas around the wildlife sanctuaries, national parks which require more protection. Keeping in mind the already fragile condition of the flora and fauna, I feel that it would be much more considerate if these sensitive areas are conserved in their natural habitat rather than getting converted into a tourist destination. Conversion into a tourist destination will only add to the already existing high levels of pollution, land degradation, soil erosion etc. which is a threat to wildlife. It will also put a lot of strain on the scarce flora and fauna. The animals need to be safe beyond the protected areas and for that conservation of ecologically sensitive state is of primary importance. -Ankita Pandey

Eco- Sensitive Areas are areas within 10 kilometers of Protected Areas, National Parks or Wild life sanctuaries, etc. notified under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. Such areas encompass extensive biodiversity and as such are quite fragile to human interference. Hence only certain activities are permitted albeit with regulations, tourism being one of them. Therefore, it wouldn't be wrong to say that eco sensitive areas are effectively a Transition Zone between the man and animal world.  I for one would favour regulated tourism in such areas for practical purposes. Firstly, since they serve as a transition zone, Tourism in such areas would serve to sensitize people about the wild habitat. Also, tourism would incentivise the tribals/locals in such areas (as they are unable to use their own local resources for their own development) and also the government (who has to spend on maintenance). That said, I'd also like to add that tourism in these areas should be highly regulated so that it doesn't wreak havoc on the sensitive biodiversity. Plastic bags, food items etc. should be prohibited and tourists shouldn't be allowed without a guide. Violators should be punished. Sustainable development that keeps biodiversity at its core is the need of the hour. It is important then, to go for regulations and not prohibitions in such cases. There has to be a balance between development and conservation. -Himanshi

Topic of the month: Do you think erosion of the most fragile sections of the Himalayas for highways is a good idea? You may send your views (either in Hindi or English) in 300 words at [email protected] Please also attach a colour photo of yourself.

Leave a comment